Explaining the Constitutional Amendments
On the December 7 Runoff Ballot you can anticipate voting on four constitutional amendments. In addition to knowing about the candidates you support and why, we want to help ensure you feel confident to vote all down the ballot. Make your voice heard as we head to the polls to decide on what should be changed in our state constitution.
Proposed Constitutional Amendment 1
Act 405 (2024 Regular Session) - Proposing to amend Article V, Section 25(C) and to add Article V, Section 25(A)(4) of the Constitution of Louisiana, relative to the judiciary commission; to require the judiciary commission to conduct certain investigations; to provide for membership of the judiciary commission; to specify an election for submission of the proposition to electors; and to provide a ballot proposition.
Do you support an amendment to allow the Supreme Court to sanction a judge upon an investigation by the Judiciary Commission, and provide that the recommended sanction shall be instituted by the Judiciary Commission or by a majority of the Supreme Court, and to provide for the appointment of five members of the judiciary commission? (Amends Article V, Section 25(C); adds Article V, Section 25(A)(4)).
The Judiciary Commission of Louisiana makes recommendations to the Supreme Court about the disqualification, censure, suspension, involuntary retirement, or removal of judges due to a variety of reasons. It currently has nine members, all of who serve four-year terms, and includes three judges selected by the Supreme Court, three attorneys selected by the Conference Court of Appeal Judges, and three citizens selected by the Louisiana District Judges Association.
This amendment would add five new members: two chosen by the Speaker of the House of Representatives, two chosen by the Senate President, and one chosen by the Governor. This would make this commission much more political and remove barriers to checks of power between branches of government. This amendment would require an investigation to take place before there can be any disciplinary action for judges and would add “malfeasance while in office” to the list of reasons for disciplinary action. Further, it would remove the confidentiality of the investigative proceedings.
A yes vote would add five political appointees to the Judiciary Commission of Louisiana, add “malfeasance while in office” to the list of reasons for disciplinary actions, and remove confidentiality of investigations.
A no vote would keep the current members of the commission without any new appointments, keep the confidentiality of investigations, and not add “malfeasance while in office” to the list of reasons for investigations.
VOTE NO
Proposed Constitutional Amendment 2
Act 406 (2024 Regular Session) - Proposing to add Article III, Section 16(F) of the Constitution of Louisiana, to provide relative to consideration of appropriations bills; to provide for time periods and required information relative thereto; to provide for submission of the proposed amendment to the
electors; and to provide for related matters.
Do you support an amendment to require that the legislature wait for at least forty-eight hours prior to concurring in a conference committee report or amendments to a bill appropriating money? (AddsArticle III, Section 16(F)).
This amendment would add a 48 hour waiting period before legislators in one branch can vote to approve a bill that was changed in the other branch. Additionally, it would add a 48 hour waiting period for amendments to bills that allocate state money. This would give legislators more time to read the changes that were passed in the other branch.
A yes vote would: add a 48 hour waiting period before legislators in one branch can vote to approve a bill that was changed in the other branch, and require legislators to wait 48 hours before voting on bills that decide how to spend state money.
A no vote would: keep current rules for the legislative branch which allows branches to vote on bills as soon as they can, even without enough time for all legislators to read the bills.
VOTE NO
Proposed Constitutional Amendment 3
Act 407 (2024 Regular Session) - Proposing to amend Article III, Section 2(A)(3)(a) and (4)(a) of the Constitution of Louisiana and to add Article III, Section 2(A)(5) of the Constitution of Louisiana, relative to regular sessions of the legislature, to allow the legislature to extend a regular session for a limited time period for a specific purpose; to provide for submission of the proposed amendment to the electors; and to provide for related matters.
Do you support an amendment to allow the legislature to extend a regular session in increments of two days up to a maximum of six days if necessary to pass a bill appropriating money? (Amends Article III, Sections 2(A)(3)(a) and (4)(a); Adds Article III, Section 2(A)(5)).
Currently, the constitution prohibits the legislature from meeting beyond scheduled dates of their legislative session. This means if there are bills that have not moved forward, the legislature is unable to move them from their last action and in a new legislative session, the process for a bill would start again. This amendment would allow the legislature to extend its regular legislative session by two day increments, up to six days, to pass a bill that appropriates state money.
A yes vote would: allow the legislature to extend the regular legislative session by 2 days at a time to pass a bill that allocates state money.
A no vote would: keep current rules for the legislative branch which does not allow the legislature to extend its regular session, even if there are bills that have not been passed.
VOTE NO
Proposed Constitutional Amendment 4
Act 409 (2024 Regular Session) - Proposing to amend Article VII, Section 25 of the Constitution of Louisiana, relative to ad valorem tax; to provide for the administration of tax sales of immovable property; to provide for the postponement of taxes under certain circumstances; and to specify an election for submission of the proposition to electors and provide a ballot proposition.
Do you support an amendment to eliminate mandatory tax sales for nonpayment of property taxes and require the legislature to provide for such procedures by law; to limit the amount of penalty and interest on delinquent property taxes; and to provide for the postponement of property tax payments under certain circumstances? (Amends Article VII, Section 25).
Currently in Louisiana, if property taxes are not paid at the end of the year that taxes are due, local parish government can put a lien on the property and auction it at a tax sale and the proceeds of the sale are applied to unpaid taxes on the property. This amendment would allow the state legislature to postpone property tax payments when there is a declared emergency or allow the tax collector to waive penalties for a good cause.
A yes vote would: allow the state legislature to postpone property tax payments when there is a declared emergency or allow the tax collector to waive penalties for a good cause.
A no vote would: keep current rules for property taxes, allowing the local parish government to put a lien on the property and auction it at a tax sale, even during declared emergencies.